ESPINOZA v. ZUCKERBERG

C.A. No. 9745-CB

124 A.3d 47 (2015)

Ernesto ESPINOZA, derivatively on behalf of Facebook, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Mark ZUCKERBERG, Sheryl K. Sandberg, Donald E. Graham, Peter A. Thiel, Marc L. Andreessen, Reed Hastings, Erskine B. Bowles, and Susan D. Desmond-Hellmann, Defendants, and Facebook, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant.

Court of Chancery of Delaware.

Decided: October 28, 2015


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathaleen St. J. McCormick and Nicholas J. Rohrer of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Brian J. Robbins , Felipe J. Arroyo and Jenny L. Dixon of Robbins Arroyo LLP, San Diego, California; Attorneys for Plaintiff.

David E. Ross and S. Michael Sirkin of Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for Defendants and Nominal Defendant.


OPINION

This case presents a question of first impression: Can a disinterested controlling stockholder ratify a transaction approved by an interested board of directors, so as to shift the standard of review from entire fairness to the business judgment presumption, by expressing assent to the transaction informally without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases