ECKLER v. NEUTROGENA CORPORATION

Nos. B253691, B253899

KAY ECKLER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NEUTROGENA CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent. STEVE ENGEL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NEUTROGENA CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

July 1, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint (Arizona) and Patricia N. Syverson ; Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint (California) and Manfred P. Meucke for Plaintiff and Appellant Kay Eckler.

Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky (California), Ian D. Berg and Takeo A. Kellar ; Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky (New York), Mitchell M.Z. Twersky (pro hac vice) and Lawrence D. Levit (pro hac vice) for Plaintiff and Appellant Steve Engel.

O'Melveny & Myers (Los Angeles), Richard B. Goetz and Cynthia A. Merrill ; O'Melveny & Myers (Newport Beach) and Amy J. Laurendeau for Defendants and Respondents Neutrogena Corporation and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.


This case concerns congressional intent with respect to label information on sunscreen products: is it to be determined solely by the federal agency it charged with ensuring uniform labeling for those products, or, in addition, by each state through private civil suits. Appellants Kay Eckler and Steve Engel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases