1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 238 Cal.App.4th
  5. 238 Cal.App.4th 81 (2015)
 

PARRISH v. LATHAM & WATKINS

No. B244841.

238 Cal.App.4th 81 (2015)

189 Cal.Rptr.3d 388

WILLIAM PARRISH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LATHAM & WATKINS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

June 26, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eagan Avenatti, Michael J. Avenatti,   Scott H. Sims ; Panish, Shea & Boyle, Brian J. Panish,   Adam K. Shea,   Kevin R. Boyle ; Esner, Chang & Boyer and Stuart B. Esner for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

McKool Smith Hennigan, J. Michael Hennigan and Michael Swartz for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

INTRODUCTION

In this case we reaffirm the principle, referred to as the interim adverse judgment rule, that the denial of a dispositive motion on the merits in an underlying action establishes the existence of probable cause and precludes the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases