SOTO v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

No. B228428.

RUBEN SOTO et al., Plaintiffs, Respondents, and Cross-Appellants, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellant and Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

Filed August 15, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baraban & Teske, Jeffrey H. Baraban and James S. Link for Defendant, Appellant and Cross-Respondent.

The Homampour Law Firm, PLC and Arash Homampour ; Law Offices of Thomas C. Zaret and Thomas C. Zaret ; and The Ehrlich Law Firm and Jeffrey Isaac Ehrlich for Plaintiffs, Respondents and Cross-Appellants.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

TURNER, P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant, Costco Wholesale Corporation, appeals from an August 17, 2010 judgment and denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Defendant argues: it owed no duty of care of plaintiffs, Ruben, Brunilda and Anabel Soto1; there is instructional error; the trial court should not have permitted evidence that a former co-defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases