1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 994 So.2d
  5. 994 So.2d 329 (2008)
 

R & B HOLDING CO. v. CHRISTOPHER ADVERTISING GROUP, INC.

Nos. 3D06-1560, 3D06-2669.

994 So.2d 329 (2008)

R & B HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation d/b/a/ Kendall Toyota, Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER ADVERTISING GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 4, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Greenberg Traurig and Arthur J. England and Julissa Rodriguez and Brigid F. Cech Samole, Miami; Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell and Peter L. Wechsler, Miami; Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell and John H. Pelzer, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Wetherington, Klein & Hubbart and Phillip A. Hubbart; Ross and Girten and Lauri Waldman Ross, Miami, for appellee.

Before COPE, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.

CORTIÑAS, J.

We consider whether replacement cost is the proper method of valuation for commercial property that was converted over ten years ago where there is no showing of any need for the reproduction of the property and no intention to reproduce it. Because we conclude that replacement cost is not the proper method of valuation in such an instance, we reverse.

Appellant, R & B Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Kendall Toyota ("Kendall Toyota"), appeals a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases