1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 150 P.3d
  5. 150 P.3d 649 (2007)
 

CLEAR CHANNEL v. SEATTLE POPULAR MONORAIL

No. 57151-6-I.

150 P.3d 649 (2007)

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. SEATTLE POPULAR MONORAIL AUTHORITY, a city transportation authority under RCW 35.95A, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

January 22, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Renwick Taylor, William Harrison Walsh, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Bradley Park Thoreson, Jeffrey Burton Taraday, P. Stephen Dijulio, Foster Pepper PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

GROSSE, J.

¶ 1 Clear Channel Outdoor (Clear Channel), owner of a billboard in Ballard, challenges the summary judgment dismissal of its claim of inverse condemnation against Seattle Popular Monorail Authority (Monorail). Because Clear Channel had no contractual right to any automatic extension or renewal of its lease agreement and occupied the property as a holdover tenant, the mere fact that Monorail took possession by a purchase and sale in lieu of condemnation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases