TRANSCONTINENTAL INS. CO. v. ISOP

No. G035046.

56 Cal.Rptr.3d 491 (2007)

148 Cal.App.4th 1296

TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

February 28, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith and Jordan Harriman; Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, Mark G. Bonino, Redwood Shores, and Michael J. Quinn, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.

Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, Jerome B. Falk, Jr., and Amy E. Margolin San Francisco; Law Offices of Timothy J. Hogan and Timothy J. Hogan for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

O'LEARY, Acting P.J.

This appeal concerns an insurance coverage dispute between an excess insurer and a primary insurer over the obligation to defend a housing developer in a construction defect case. The court determined the excess insurer, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ISOP), had an obligation to pay the developer's defense costs. ISOP asserts other carriers providing coverage for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases