MATTER OF SHUMAN v. NEW YORK STATE RACING AND WAGERING BOARD


40 A.D.3d 385 (2007)

835 N.Y.S.2d 569

In the Matter of MARK SHUMAN, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE RACING AND WAGERING BOARD, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 17, 2007.


It is well established that judicial review of an administrative determination is limited to consideration of whether or not that determination is supported by substantial evidence (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 179 [1978]; Matter of Vallebuona v Kerik, 294 A.D.2d 44, 50 [2002]), and the issue of whether substantial evidence exists to support the agency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases