COPART, INC. v. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BD.

No. 06-9535.

495 F.3d 1197 (2007)

COPART, INC., Petitioner, v. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. Charles L. Dalton, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

July 31, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Submitted on the briefs:*

Steven A. Broussard, Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C., Tulsa, OK, for Petitioner.

Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Joseph M. Woodward, Associate Solicitor for Occupational Safety and Health, Michael P. Doyle, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Ronald Gottlieb, Attorney, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Robt. S. Coffey, Robt. S. Coffey, Inc., Tulsa, OK, for Intervenor.

Before BRISCOE, McKAY, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.


GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

The question presented in this case is whether an order of this court simply stating "Petitioner's Motion for Attorney Fees is denied" decided, either explicitly or by necessary implication, the issue of intervenor Charles Dalton's entitlement to fees for his attorney's work before this court from petitioner Copart, Inc., under 49 U.S.C. § 31105(b)(3)(B), a provision of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 ("STAA"). Because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases