MEDES v. GEICO CORP.

No. 26504.

905 A.2d 1249 (2006)

97 Conn.App. 630

Heather MEDES, et al. v. GEICO CORPORATION.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided September 26, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph M. Merly, with whom, on the brief, was John R. Williams, New Haven, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Kieran S. Cassidy, for the appellee (defendant).

DiPENTIMA, ROGERS and LAVINE, Js.


LAVINE, J.

Although the jury returned a verdict in their favor, the plaintiffs, Heather Medes and Dara Medes, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Geico Corporation, in this underinsured motorist action. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) admitted evidence about their religion and related activities, (2) allowed impermissible arguments in summation to the jury, (3) pressured the jury by setting an implicit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases