1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 443 F.3d
  5. 443 F.3d 832 (2006)
 

HOLLOMAN v. MAIL-WELL CORP.

No. 05-10850.

443 F.3d 832 (2006)

Otis J. HOLLOMAN, Jonella Holloman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MAIL-WELL CORPORATION, as Successor in Interest to Curtis 1000, Inc., an American Business Products Inc. Company, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Douglas Vaughn, George Melville Johnson & Associates, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

William P. Sweeney, James J. Convery, Laner, Muchin, Dombrow, Becker, Levin & Tominberg, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before DUBINA and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG, Judge.

MARCUS, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Otis J. Holloman and Jonella Holloman appeal from the district court's order of final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee Mail-Well Corp. ("Mail-Well") on their claims brought under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1101-1114. After thorough review, we conclude that the district court correctly granted final summary judgment on the Hollomans' claims. Moreover, we are unpersuaded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases