DUNHAM v. ROER

No. A05-421.

708 N.W.2d 552 (2006)

Debra Ali DUNHAM, Appellant, v. Karen P. ROER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 10, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jill E. Clark, Golden Valley, MN, for appellant.

Stephen O. Plunkett, Shanda K. Pearson, Rider Bennett, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by Chief Judge TOUSSAINT, Presiding Judge; DIETZEN, Judge; and CRIPPEN, Judge.


OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court order and judgment granting summary judgment to respondent and dismissing appellant's claims (a) that the harassment definition in Minn.Stat. § 609.748, subd. 1(a)(1) (harassment statute) is facially unconstitutional; and (b) for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and defamation. Appellant contends that the harassment statute is facially...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases