TRI v. J.T.T.

No. 03-0794.

162 S.W.3d 552 (2005)

Chon TRI a/k/a Hien Dinh Nguyen and Theravada Buddhist Corporation, Petitioners, v. J.T.T. and M.T., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Decided May 13, 2005.

Rehearing Denied June 10, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant Parker Harpold, Hargis & Harpold, L.L.P., Houston, for Petitioners.

Richard L. Flowers Jr., Kevin McEvily, McEvily & Flowers, Michael O. Whitmire, Christopher Lynn Ashby, Ashby & Whitmire, Houston, for Respondents.


Justice OWEN delivered the opinion of the Court.

The ultimate question in this case is whether the trial court was required to render a judgment other than the one it did based on the jury's findings. There were two theories of liability — conspiracy and negligence. Conspiracy is a ground of recovery that has more than one element. Some but not all the elements of conspiracy were submitted to and found by the jury, and the trial court was not asked to and did...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases