1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 35 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 31 (2005)
 

PEREGRINE FUNDING v. SHEPPARD

No. A104481.

35 Cal.Rptr.3d 31 (2005)

133 Cal.App.4th 658

PEREGRINE FUNDING, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

October 19, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rogers Joseph O'Donnell & Phillips, Pamela Phillips, Sean M. SeLegue and John S. Throckmorton, San Francisco, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bartko, Zankel, Tarrant & Miller, John J. Bartko, Robert H. Bunzel and Howard L. Pearlman, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

McGUINESS, P.J.

This case is one of several arising from the collapse of a large Ponzi scheme.1 Plaintiffs — investors who lost millions in the scheme and a bankruptcy trustee representing entities that were used to perpetrate the scheme — have sued the law firm Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP (Sheppard), claiming its negligence and affirmative misconduct helped the perpetrators of the scheme avoid detection and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases