1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 25 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 25 Cal.Rptr.3d 320 (2005)
 

CAMPBELL v. REGENTS OF UNIV. OF CALIFORNIA

No. S113275.

25 Cal.Rptr.3d 320 (2005)

35 Cal.4th 311

106 P.3d 976

Janet CAMPBELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. The REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California.

Rehearing Denied May 18, 2005.

Certiorari Denied October 11, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo F. Donahue, Gold River; Law Offices of Martin F. Jennings, Jr., Martin J. Jennings, Jr., and Stephan Mandell, Granite Bay, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

E. Lyn Lemaire, Topanga, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Morgenstein & Jubelirer, William J. Carroll and Jennifer K. Achtert, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent.

Certiorari Denied October 11, 2005. See 126 S.Ct. 428.

CHIN, J.

In this action, we address whether an employee of the Regents of the University of California (the Regents) must exhaust university internal administrative remedies before filing suit in superior court for retaliatory termination under either Government Code section 12653, subdivision (c), or Labor Code section 1102.5, sometimes called the "whistleblower" statutes. We conclude the exhaustion rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases