1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 395 F.3d
  5. 395 F.3d 1275 (2005)
 

TRINTEC INDUSTRIES v. PEDRE PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS

No. 04-1293.

395 F.3d 1275 (2005)

TRINTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. and TIME TO INVENT, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PEDRE PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 19, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Vanderhye, Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C., of Arlington, Virginia, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert S. Churchill, Eaton & Van Winkle LLP, of New York, New York argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Robert L. Vogel, Vogel & Slade, of Washington, DC.

Before RADER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

This appeal challenges the district court's dismissal of a patent suit for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Trintec Indus., Inc. v. Pedre Promotional Prods. Inc., No. 1:03-CV-01267-RCL (D.D.C. Mar. 25, 2004) (order granting motion to dismiss) ("Dismissal Order"). We vacate and remand for the district court to reconsider in accordance with our opinion.

I

The appellants, Trintec Industries, Inc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases