1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 325 B.R.
  5. 325 B.R. 709 (2005)
 

IN RE RAILWORKS CORP.

Bankruptcy No. 01-64463-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64464-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64465-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64466-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64467-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64468-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64469-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64470-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64471-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64472-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64473-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64474-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64475-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64476-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64477-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64478-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64479-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64480-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64481-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64482-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64483-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64484-SD, Bankruptcy No. 01-64485-SD, Adversary No. 03-5781, Adversary No. 03-5784, Adversary No. 03-5795.

325 B.R. 709 (2005)

In re RAILWORKS CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Zvi Guttman, Litigation Trustee, v. Roy O. Martin, III, et al.; Harsco Corporation, et al.; Craig A. Simmons, et al., Defendants.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland.

May 5, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Goldberg, Erin E. Johnson, Shapiro, Sher, Guinot & Sandler, Baltimore, MD, for Zvi Guttman.

Douglas Robert Gorius, Esquire, Lori S. Simpson, Esquire, Bishop, Daneman & Simpson, LLC, Baltimore, MD, Brandon A. Brown, Esquire, Louis M. Phillips, Esquire, Gordon, Arata, McCollam, Duplantis & Eagan, L.L.P., Baton Rouge, LA, J. Stephen Simms, Esquire, Simms Showers LLP, Baltimore, MD, Randall L. Wilmore, Esquire, Bradley L. Drell, Esquire, Gregory Upton, Esquire, J. Grave Theus, Jr., Esquire, Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell, Alexandria, LA, Linda V. Donhauser, Esquire, Matthew G. Summers, Esquire, Miles & Stockbridge P.C., Baltimore, MD, for Defendants.

Mark Neal, Assistant U.S. Trustee, Office of the United States Trustee, Baltimore, MD, U.S. Trustee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT TO AVOID FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS (Corrected)

E. STEPHEN DERBY, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Issues

Defendants' motions to dismiss raise two issues. First, does the Litigation Trustee under the Debtors' confirmed plan of reorganization have standing to bring these fraudulent conveyance avoidance actions under 11 U.S.C. § 544(b)? Second, does this court have subject...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases