1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 144 S.W.3d
  5. 144 S.W.3d 487 (2004)
 

ERAZO v. STATE

No. 2206-02.

144 S.W.3d 487 (2004)

Alex ERAZO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 16, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas M. Durham, Houston, for Appellant.

Alan Curry, Asst. DA, Houston, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin.

OPINION

PRICE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which MEYERS, WOMACK, JOHNSON, HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Yet those words, in the context of a criminal trial, must be the right words. Otherwise, the picture from whence the words flow is inadmissible. A photograph is inadmissible under Rule of Evidence 403 if it is substantially more prejudicial than probative. In this case, the trial court admitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases