1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 19 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 19 Cal.Rptr.3d 213 (2004)
 

HURWITZ v. CITY OF ORANGE

No. G032479.

19 Cal.Rptr.3d 213 (2004)

122 Cal.App.4th 835

Mark HURWITZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF ORANGE, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

September 24, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. DeBerry, City Attorney; Law Offices of Stephen M. McNamara and Stephen M. McNamara for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Offices of Hurwitz & Hurwitz and Michael J. Meade for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

I. Introduction: This Case is About A Party Trying to Take Advantage of Its Own Wrong

This is a textbook example of a party trying to take advantage of its own wrong. In this case the opportunistic party is the City of Orange. The wrong is that the city violated a preliminary injunction not to build in a certain area or otherwise interfere with existing parking access enjoyed by a property owner. We will repeat the essence of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases