HARTFORD STEAM v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S

No. 17024.

857 A.2d 893 (2004)

271 Conn. 474

HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION AND INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S AND COMPANIES COLLECTIVE et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided October 12, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Birsic, pro hac vice, with whom were Paul K. Stockman, pro hac vice, and Maurice T. Fitz-Maurice, Hartford, for the appellant-appellee (plaintiff).

Linda L. Morkan, with whom were Clayton H. Farnham, pro hac vice, and, on the brief, Patrick J. Sweeney, Hartford, for the appellees-appellants (defendants).

SULLIVAN, C.J., and BORDEN, NORCOTT, PALMER and ZARELLA, Js.


ZARELLA, J.

The determinative issue in this appeal is whether the judgment of the trial court directing a rehearing by the arbitration panel to clarify the award constitutes a final judgment or an otherwise appealable interlocutory order, thereby implicating our subject matter jurisdiction. We determine that the trial court's remand order does not constitute a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order and, therefore, that we lack subject matter jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases