1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 131 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 131 Cal.Rptr.2d 387 (2003)
 

TIMNEY v. LIN

No. A098229.

131 Cal.Rptr.2d 387 (2003)

106 Cal.App.4th 1121

Susan TIMNEY et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Steve LIN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

March 7, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. McDonnell, Myers, Hawley, Morley, Myers & McDonnell, Los Altos, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Stanley W. Smith, Niven & Smith, San Francisco, for Defendants and Respondents.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

STEVENS, Acting P.J.

In the published portions of this opinion, we hold that an illegal forfeiture provision is unenforceable, even if the illegal provision is included in a settlement agreement.

This is an appeal from a ruling by the trial court on a motion to enforce a settlement agreement under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. Appellants Susan Timney and Lynda Kretlow contend...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases