HELMY v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY


836 A.2d 802 (2003)

178 N.J. 183

Mohamed A. HELMY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Jersey City Police Department, Police Officer Gary Moffit, Police Officer Steven Collier, and Police Officer Mark Pryor, Defendants-Respondents, and Police Officer Jane Doe, (a fictitious name for an unidentified person), and Police Officer John Doe, (a fictitious name for an unidentified person), Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 15, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Francis Gold, Morristown, argued the cause for appellant (Gold, Albanese, Barletti & Velazquez, attorneys; Radames Velazquez, Jr., on the brief).

Kathleen A. Walrod, Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for respondents (Alexander W. Booth, Jr., Jersey City Corporation Counsel, attorney; Nora L. Kallen, Assistant Corporation Counsel, on the letter brief).


Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court.

A jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Mohamed Helmy in connection with his claim for malicious prosecution against defendants, City of Jersey City, Jersey City Police Department and certain police officers. The trial court granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and the Appellate Division affirmed. The gravamen of both opinions is that a disconnection between the jury's finding regarding Helmy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases