Justice O'NEILL delivered the opinion of the Court.
In this case, we must decide whether an insurance company owes its at-will independent agent a common-law duty of ordinary care in investigating the agent's alleged misconduct. We must also determine whether the company's alleged conduct will support the agent's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. A divided court of appeals held that the company did owe its agent such a duty,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.