EPPENDORF-NETHELER-HINZ GMBH v. RITTER GMBH

Nos. 00-60875, 01-60658.

289 F.3d 351 (2002)

EPPENDORF-NETHELER-HINZ GMBH, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. RITTER GMBH; RK Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Eppendorf-Netheler-Hinz GMBH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ritter GMBH; RK Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 22, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Jonthan Toren (argued), Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, New York City, Cecil Maison Heidelberg, Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, Jackson, MS, Joseph V. Jest, Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Washington, DC, for Eppendorf-Netheler-Hinz GMBH.

William Jerome Utermohlen (argued), Michael Steven Culver, Oliff & Berridge, Alexandria, VA, for Ritter GMBH and RK Mfg. Inc.

Before JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges, and FELDMAN, District Judge.


EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-Appellants Ritter GMBH and RK Manufacturing, Inc., appeal the district court's judgment that they infringed upon Eppendorf-Netheler-Hinz GMBH's trade-dress rights in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that Eppendorf failed to carry its burden of proof on the issue of non-functionality, and reverse the judgment of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases