1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 92 S.W.3d
  5. 92 S.W.3d 502 (2002)
 

SPROUSE v. SPROUSE

No. 01-0752.

92 S.W.3d 502 (2002)

Jesse Richard SPROUSE, Petitioner, v. Patricia Ann SPROUSE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

August 29, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William. Liddell, Houston, for Petitioner.

Steven A. Sinkin, Karen L. Marvel, Sinkin & Barretto, P.L.L.C., San Antonio, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This case involves an important question-whether the dormancy provisions in Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code sections 31.006 and 34.001 apply to past-due child support payments. We explicitly reserved this question in In re A.D., 73 S.W.3d 244, 249 (Tex.2002). But because of the state of this record, we decline to decide the question here. The petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases