1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 50 P.3d
  5. 50 P.3d 266 (2002)
 

VAN BLARICOM v. KRONENBERG

No. 47666-1-I.

50 P.3d 266 (2002)

112 Wash.App. 501

Donald P. VAN BLARICOM and Janice L. Van Blaricom, Appellants, v. Donald B. KRONENBERG and Jane Doe Kronenberg, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

July 15, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elena Luisa Garella, Arnold Joseph Barer, Law Offices of Arnold J. Barer, Seattle, for Appellants.

Anne Melani Bremner, Theron A. Buck, Stafford Frey Cooper, Seattle, for Respondents.

SCHINDLER, J.

This case raises the issue of whether an attorney who uses RCW 6.25.070(2) to obtain a prejudgment writ of attachment on real property without prior notice or hearing and in the absence of exigent circumstances may be liable under 42 U.S.C § 1983. We hold there may be such liability.

Attorney Donald Kronenberg represented Theresa Obermiller in a lawsuit against Donald Van Blaricom alleging he had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases