YOUNG v. CITY OF ST. CHARLES, MO.

No. 00-1892.

244 F.3d 623 (2001)

John YOUNG, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. CHARLES, MISSOURI, David King, individually and in his official capacity as former Chief of Police of the City of St. Charles, MO; Michael Miller, individually and in his official capacity as City Administrator of the City of St. Charles, MO; Fred Wahl, individually and in his official capacity as a Member of the Personnel Board of the City of St. Charles, MO; Harold Webbink, individually and in his official capacity as a Member of the Personnel Board of the City of St. Charles, MO; William Hurst, individually and in his official capacity as a Member of the Personnel Board of the City of St. Charles, MO; Gilbert Lauer, individually and in his official capacity as a Member of the Personnel Board of the City of St. Charles, MO; Michelle Sheehan, individually and in her official capacity as a Member of the Personnel Board of the City of St. Charles, MO; Dale Hawkins, individually and in his official capacity as a Member of the Personnel Board of the City of St. Charles, MO, Defendants/Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: March 23, 2001.

As Amended: May 1, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Gregory Kloeppel, St. Louis, Missouri.

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Robert John Krehbiel, St. Louis, Missouri.

Before BEAM and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and DOTY, District Judge.


DOTY, District Judge.

John Young, a police officer with the City of St. Charles, Missouri, was terminated from his position for submitting altered documents. He brought a civil rights action against the city and certain defendants who had upheld his dismissal alleging that he had been denied procedural and substantive due process. The district court2 granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, concluding that Young received all the process...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases