STATE v. HARTMAN

No. 98-1475.

93 Ohio St.3d 274 (2001)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HARTMAN, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 3, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, Paul M. Maric and Philip D. Bogdanoff, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee.

Irving B. Sugerman and Nathan A. Ray, for appellant.


LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.

In this appeal, defendant-appellant, Brett X. Hartman, raises thirteen propositions of law. Finding none meritorious, we affirm his convictions. We have also independently weighed the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors and compared his sentence to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. As a result, we affirm defendant's convictions and sentence of death.

Defendant met Winda Snipes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases