1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 259 F.3d
  5. 259 F.3d 1383 (2001)
 

PALL CORP. v. PTI TECH. INC.

No. 00-1203, 00-1215

259 F.3d 1383 (2001)

Pall Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. Pti Technologies Inc., Defendant-Appellant, and Kurabo Industries, Ltd., Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided August 7, 2001

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Michael Hartmann, Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Christopher T. Griffith, and Gregory C. Bays.

Arthur Wineburg, Pillsbury Winthrop LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Susan T. Brown, Michael A. Conely, Michael R. Dzwonczyk, and Janine A. Carlan.

Before SCHALL, FRIEDMAN, and DYK,

DYK, Circuit Judge.

PTI Technologies Inc. ("PTI") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granting the motion of Pall Corporation ("Pall") for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,663,041 (the " '041 patent"), the dismissal of PTI's counterclaim for infringement of the '041 patent, and the denial of PTI's request for a permanent injunction. Pall Corp. v. PTI Techs. Inc.,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases