STATE v. CITY OF OAK CREEK

No. 97-2188.

232 Wis.2d 612 (2000)

2000 WI 9

605 N.W.2d 526

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. CITY OF OAK CREEK, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 10, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Joanne F. Kloppenburg, assistant attorney general with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general.

For the defendant-appellant there was a brief by Lawrence J. Haskin, City Attorney and Lawrie J. Kobza, Richard L. Bolton, M. Tess O'Brien-Heinzen and Boardman, Suhr, Curry & Field, LLP, Madison and oral argument by Lawrence J. Haskin.


¶ 1. N. PATRICK CROOKS, J.

The attorney general, claiming to be acting on behalf of the State of Wisconsin, brought an action for injunctive relief under Wis. Stat. §§ 30.294, 823.01, and 832.02 (1995-96)1 to require the city of Oak Creek to remove a concrete channel from a quarter mile length of Crawfish Creek, a tributary that flows through the city. The attorney general alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases