1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 92 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 92 Cal.Rptr.2d 611 (2000)
 

BEGNAL v. CANFIELD & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Nos. A080976, A081325, A081539, A084814, A084822, A082259.

92 Cal.Rptr.2d 611 (2000)

78 Cal.App.4th 66

Camille BEGNAL et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CANFIELD & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant and Appellant. Jeannie McKenzie, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Canfield & Associates, Inc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 9, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Wynne, Matthew Righetti, Righetti Law Firm, San Francisco, Ellen Lake, Oakland, Attorneys for Appellant Jeannie McKenzie and Respondents Begnal, Suerth and Ebey.

Paul C. Nyquist, Kevin W. Kirsch, Newport Beach, Oppenheimer, Wolff & Donnelly, Irvine, Attorneys for Appellant and Respondent Canfield.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

STEIN, J.

Camille Bengal, Connie Ebey, Mary Ann Suerth and Jeannie McKenzie sued their former employer, Canfield & Associates, Inc., alleging their employment was terminated based upon their age in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) Government Code section 12900 et seq. The jury found that Canfield had terminated all four plaintiffs based upon their age, but the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases