1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 203 F.3d
  5. 203 F.3d 218 (2000)
 

KEEFE v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CAS. INS. CO.

No. 99-1292.

203 F.3d 218 (2000)

Cindy KEEFE v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided February 2, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin E. Zuckerman (argued), Cozen and O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Appellant.

Joseph F. Roda (argued), Roda & Nast, Lancaster, PA, counsel for Appellee.

Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, McKEE, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Chief Judge:

This bad faith insurance claim, founded on diversity jurisdiction, presents an important question of Pennsylvania insurance law: whether a carrier offering uninsured motorist (UM) coverage has a duty to pay an undisputed part of a UM claim while another part remains in dispute. However, because this case is before us in the unusual procedural posture of an appeal from a consent judgment, before we reach this question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases