1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 93 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 93 Cal.Rptr.2d 259 (2000)
 

CENTEX GOLDEN CONST. CO. v. DALE TILE CO.

No. D030452.

93 Cal.Rptr.2d 259 (2000)

78 Cal.App.4th 992

CENTEX GOLDEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DALE TILE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

Rehearing Denied March 28, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fredrickson, Mazeika & Grant, Dennis W. Fredrickson, Peter S. Gregorovic, Robert L. Friedenberg, San Diego, and Shari I. Weintraub, for Defendant and Appellant.

Deb C. Pedersdotter, San Diego; Hillyer & Irwin and Timothy C. Earl, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

BENKE, Acting P.J.

An agreement by a subcontractor to indemnify a general contractor for any claim made with respect to the work covered by or incidental to their subcontract may require indemnity even if the claim is not meritorious and the subcontractor is not guilty of any negligence. Thus we affirm the trial court's judgment in favor of a general contractor against a subcontractor on the general contractor's claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases