SHEARER v. NAFTZINGER


747 A.2d 859 (2000)

Paul E. SHEARER and Jeanne Shearer, his wife, Appellees, v. Charles W. NAFTZINGER and Elizabeth Naftzinger, his wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided March 6, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard W. Stewart, Lemoyne, for appellants Charles and Elizabeth Naftzinger.

L.C. Heim, York, for appellees Paul and Jeanne Shearer.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.


OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

The sole issue before us is whether the statute of limitations set forth at 42 Pa. C.S. § 5529 constitutes a defense in a proceeding to revive and continue the lien of a judgment. For the following reasons, we affirm the order of the Superior Court.

On July 12, 1974, appellees Paul and Jeanne Shearer (Shearers) entered judgment by confession against appellants Charles and Elizabeth Naftzinger (Naftzingers) in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases