GRYNBERG v. DOME PETROLEUM CORP.

No. 980278.

599 N.W.2d 261 (1999)

1999 ND 167

Jack J. GRYNBERG and Jack Grynberg and Associates, Plaintiffs and Appellants v. DOME PETROLEUM CORP., UV Industries, Inc., Amoco Canada Petroleum Company, Ltd., and Amoco Canada Resources, Inc., Defendants and Appellees Texaco Producing, Inc., Defendant

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Rehearing Denied September 8, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis E. Johnson, Johnson & Sundeen, Watford City, for plaintiffs and appellants.

John Patrick Brendel (argued) and Burke J. Ellingson (appearance), Brendel & Zinn, St. Paul, for defendants and appellees.


NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jack J. Grynberg and Jack Grynberg and Associates ("Grynberg") appealed from a summary judgment dismissing an action for damages against Dome Petroleum Corporation and UV Industries, Inc., for alleged overcharging in drilling oil and gas wells. We hold the trial court properly granted Dome summary judgment because the parties' contract unambiguously said Dome's cost statements for the wells were conclusively presumed correct unless Grynberg...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases