1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 76 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 255 (1998)
 

PEOPLE v. DELOZA

No. S061929.

76 Cal.Rptr.2d 255 (1998)

957 P.2d 945

18 Cal.4th 585

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. David DELOZA, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

July 9, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Fitzer, Los Angeles, and Gary M. Mandinach, under appointments by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Carol Wendelin Pollack, Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Sanjay T. Kumar, Jaime L. Fuster and Alan D. Tate, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

BROWN, Justice.

In this case we consider whether the same analysis used to determine if multiple punishment is permitted under Penal Code1 section 6542 should be used to determine if consecutive sentencing is required by section 1170.12, subdivision (a)(6) and (a)(7) (subdivision (a)(6) and (a)(7)).3 We conclude these analyses are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases