1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 81 Ohio
  5. 81 Ohio St.3d 117 (1998)
 

RUCKMAN v. CUBBY DRILLING, INC.

Nos. 96-1788, 96-1790 and 96-1791.

81 Ohio St.3d 117 (1998)

RUCKMAN, APPELLEE, v. CUBBY DRILLING, INC., APPELLANT. RIGGS, APPELLEE, v. CUBBY DRILLING, INC., APPELLANT. BROSIUS, APPELLEE, v. CUBBY DRILLING, INC., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 25, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Becker and James E. Wilhelm, Jr., for appellees Kenneth E. Ruckman, Jr. and Richard T. Brosius.

Brian & Brian, Steven J. Brian and Brian R. Mertes, for appellee John W. Riggs III.

Millisor & Nobil and Sara L. Rose; Garvin & Hickey, L.L.C., and Michael J. Hickey, for appellant Cubby Drilling, Inc.

Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

COOK, J.

This case presents the court with two distinct yet interrelated issues: (1) whether the Cubby employees were fixed-situs employees within the meaning of the coming-and-going rule despite the temporary nature of their work assignments and, if they were, (2) whether the employees nevertheless overcame the presumption embodied in the coming-and-going rule by specifically demonstrating that their injuries...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases