1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 978 S.W.2d
  5. 978 S.W.2d 535 (1998)
 

CHRISMAN v. HILL HOME DEVELOPMENT, INC.

978 S.W.2d 535 (1998)

James and Carolyn CHRISMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HILL HOME DEVELOPMENT, INC. and Jim Hill, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville.

October 26, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terrill L. Adkins, Knoxville, for Appellants.

Donald E. Overton, Glenna W. Overton, Knoxville, for Appellees.

OPINION

BIRCH, Justice.

We granted permission to appeal under Rule 11, Tenn. R.App. P.,1 to Jim Hill and Hill Home Development, Inc., the defendants, in order to determine whether they are entitled to summary judgment on the plaintiffs' claims of concealment or nuisance. With regard to the claim of concealment, we find that Hill is entitled to summary judgment because he has demonstrated that the plaintiffs are unable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases