1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 579 N.W.2d
  5. 579 N.W.2d 906 (1998)
 

LYTLE v. MALADY

Docket No. 102515, Calendar No. 11.

579 N.W.2d 906 (1998)

Nancy LYTLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael MALADY and Howmet Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided July 1, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bott & Spencer, P.C. by Timothy J. Bott and Karen M. Spencer, Muskegon, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett, L.L.P. by Joseph J. Vogan and Paul M. Kara, Grand Rapids, for Defendant-Appellant.

Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone by Charles S. Mishkind, Grand Rapids, amicus curiae, for Michigan Chamber of Commerce.

ON REHEARING

Opinion

WEAVER, Justice.

We granted rehearing in this case to clarify the evidentiary standard that plaintiff, alleging age and gender discrimination, must satisfy to survive summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10). We hold that even when an employer's decision to reduce its work force is deemed bona fide, a plaintiff may survive a motion for summary disposition by presenting sufficient admissible evidence to create a reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases