STATE v. PERRY

No. 97-628.

83 Ohio St.3d 41 (1998)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. PERRY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 19, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Steven W. Rakow, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Christine Y. Jones and Jay Clark, for appellee.

Frost & Jacobs, L.L.P., and Stephen L. Gillen, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Microsoft Corporation.

Sandra E. Pinkerton and Robert L. Berry, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Buckeye State Sheriffs Association.


MOYER, C.J.

We hold that prosecution of state charges of unauthorized use that are based solely upon the unauthorized uploading, downloading, and posting of computer software on a computer bulletin board is preempted by the federal copyright laws.

I

The federal copyright laws expressly preempt any state law actions which govern "legal or equitable rights that are equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of copyright...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases