1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 131 F.3d
  5. 131 F.3d 836 (1997)
 

DOE v. LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NAT. LABORATORY

No. 93-16792.

131 F.3d 836 (1997)

John DOE, Ph.D., and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY, John Nuckolls, Director, and the Regents of the University of California, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 15, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Gayer, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Douglas H. Barton, Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus, Vlahos & Rudy, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: CHOY, CANBY and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Dr. John Doe ("Doe") appealed the district court's dismissal of two claims: the first a breach of contract claim against the University of California ("University"), as manager of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ("Laboratory"); the second a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against John Nuckolls ("Nuckolls"), in his official capacity as Director of the Laboratory.

We AFFIRM the district court's dismissal of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases