U.S. v. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Nos. 97-1287, 97-1382.

129 F.3d 681 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided November 25, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey Swope, Boston, MA, with whom Matthew P. Schaeffer and Palmer & Dodge LLP were on brief, for respondent.

Sara S. Holderness, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, with whom Loretta C. Argrett, Assistant Attorney General, Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Charles E. Brookhart, Tax Division, Department of Justice, were on brief, for petitioner.

Before BOUDIN, Circuit Judge, HILL, Senior Circuit Judge, and POLLAK, Senior District Judge.


BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns an attempt by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to assert the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine in response to a document request by the Internal Revenue Service. The most important issue presented is whether MIT's disclosure of certain of the documents to another government agency caused it to lose the privilege. The background facts are essentially undisputed.

MIT is a famous university...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases