1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 104 F.3d
  5. 104 F.3d 230 (1997)
 

U.S. EX REL. HALL v. TELEDYNE WAH CHANG ALBANY

No. 95-35693.

104 F.3d 230 (1997)

UNITED STATES ex rel., Christopher HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TELEDYNE WAH CHANG ALBANY; Teledyne Industries, Inc., dba Teledyne Wah Chang Albany and Teledyne, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided January 7, 1997.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing March 19, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve W. Berman and Jeffrey T. Sprung, Hagens & Berman, Seattle, Washington, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Brad D. Brian, Michael R. Doyen, and Ilana B. Rubenstein, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, California, for the defendants-appellees.

Before WRIGHT, SCHROEDER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc March 19, 1997.

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.

The district court dismissed a qui tam action against the defendant-appellee Teledyne Wah Chang Albany, Teledyne Industries, Inc., d.b.a. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany, and Teledyne, Inc. (collectively, "Teledyne"). The court did so because the plaintiff, Christopher Hall ("Hall"), had already sued Teledyne in state court and had settled, executing a release...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases