1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 80 Ohio
  5. 80 Ohio St.3d 234 (1997)
 

STATE v. ROBINETTE

No. 94-1143.

80 Ohio St.3d 234 (1997)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ROBINETTE, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 12, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carley J. Ingram, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

James D. Ruppert and Deborah A. Bailey, for appellee.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Jeffrey Sutton, State Solicitor, and Simon B. Karas, Deputy Chief Counsel, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General.

W. Andrew Hasselbach and Margery Koosed, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Jeffrey M. Gamso and Joan M. Englund, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation, Inc.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.

The first issue that we must determine is whether this court's prior holding should be reaffirmed under the adequate and independent ground of the Constitution of the state of Ohio.

When the United States Supreme Court incorporated the federal Bill of Rights into the Fourteenth Amendment, the United States Constitution became the primary mechanism to safeguard an individual's rights. See Principled Interpretations of State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases