IN RE MARRIAGE OF LITTLEFIELD

No. 64471-3.

940 P.2d 1362 (1997)

133 Wash.2d 39

In re the MARRIAGE OF Edmund W. LITTLEFIELD, Jr., Respondent, and Charissa L.D. Littlefield, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided August 7, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwards, Sieh, Hathaway, Smith & Goodfriend, Catherine W. Smith, Cynthia Whitaker, Seattle, for Appellant.

Frank W. Birkholz, V. Lee Rees, Seattle, Charles K. Wiggins, Bainbridge Island, for Respondent.

Cathy J. Zavis, Seattle, Amicus Curiae on Behalf of the Northwest Women's Laws Center.


GUY, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether a trial court entering an initial parenting plan has authority to order the primary residential parent of a child to live in a particular geographic area in order to facilitate frequent contact between the child and the other parent. We hold that under the Parenting Act of 1987, Laws of 1987, ch. 460, a trial court has no such authority. We also hold that a trial court is not bound by parenting plan provisions contained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases