TRUITT v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Docket No. B113848.

59 Cal.App.4th 1183 (1997)

LAWRENCE A. TRUITT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

December 8, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Fogel, Feldman, Ostrov, Ringler & Klevens, Larry R. Feldman, Richard L. Rosett and Thomas H. Peters for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Preston, Gates & Ellis and Gregory L. Evans for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

GRIGNON, Acting P.J.

Plaintiff and petitioner Lawrence A. Truitt seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent court to vacate its order imposing evidentiary sanctions against him for his attorneys' violation of California Rules of Professional Conduct, rule 2-100,1 which prohibits ex parte communications with a represented opposing party. We conclude no improper ex parte communication took place...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases