U.S. v. QUEEN

No. 96-4085.

132 F.3d 991 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roland Demingo QUEEN, a/k/a Mingo, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided December 29, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Arcangelo Michael Tuminelli, Baltimore, MD, for Appellant. Andrew George Warrens Norman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge RUSSELL and Judge MOTZ joined.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

The primary issue raised in this appeal is whether evidence of the defendant's prior acts of witness tampering were properly admitted under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) to prove the element of intent in a later prosecution for a separate act of witness tampering...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases