STACY & WITBECK v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. A069340.

47 Cal.App.4th 1 (1996)

STACY & WITBECK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

July 2, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Louise H. Rene, City Attorney, Dennis Aftergut, Chief Assistant City Attorney, and Sheryl L. Bregman, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

Geoffrey Spellberg as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Stanton, Kay & Watson and Richard A. Bunn for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

McInerney & Dillon, William H. McInerney and Carol K. Watson as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

ANDERSON, P.J.

This appeal involves the second prong of the question posed in Stacy & Witbeck, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1074 [42 Cal.Rptr.2d 805] (Stacy I):1 whether a publication filed for a litigation and a nonlitigation purpose is privileged in both the judicial and administrative arenas...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases