1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 80 F.3d
  5. 80 F.3d 336 (1996)
 

CAHILL v. LIBERTY MUT. INS. CO.

No. 94-55943.

80 F.3d 336 (1996)

Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 25, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Wise, Stegman & Wise, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Susan T. Olson and Lisa M. Kralik, Grace, Skocypec, Cosgrove & Schirm, Los Angeles, California, for defendants-appellees.

Before BRIGHT, SKOPIL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.

BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge:

Charles and Aniko Cahill filed suit against Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (Liberty), seeking to recover from Liberty the amount of an existing default judgment obtained in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Associated Farm Management, Inc. (AFM). Upon remand from this court, the district court1 dismissed the complaint without leave to amend, determining that the Cahills could not bring a direct action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases