1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 78 F.3d
  5. 78 F.3d 1277 (1996)
 

RIFKIN v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORP.

No. 95-2605.

78 F.3d 1277 (1996)

Leonard RIFKIN; James F. Hutson, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Gerald Blair, Appellants, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided March 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kurt S. Odenwald, St. Louis, MO, argued (Jim J. Shoemake, on the brief), for appellant.

Thomas E. Wack, St. Louis, MO, argued (Robert T. Ebert, Jr. and Robert W. Lockwood, Jr., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BEAM, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and ALSOP, District Judge.

ALSOP, District Judge.

Appellants Leonard Rifkin, et al., bring this action claiming McDonnell Douglas Corporation violated their rights under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification ("WARN") Act by failing to provide timely notice to workers who suffered an employment loss. 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-09 (1992). They appeal the District Court's1 ruling that there was no "mass layoff" as defined in the WARN Act because the requisite...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases